The TV kicks explodes the diamond energy water advertisement The diamond hydraulic engine user, please immediately examine the kidney!!! Please immediately forward for all diamond hydraulic engine user, the boundless beneficence!!! Diamond hydraulic engine user infection renal glomerulus nephritis – Miss Li 32 years old, every year have the custom which the routine whole body examines, in February, 2006, Miss Li has installed bench drill quarry water machine, after starts to live has drunk the lu water, in April, 2006 does the routine whole body examines when detected infects the renal glomerulus nephritis, the kidney function started to decline. According to knows Malaysia , Singapore and Hong Kong had the multi-people to infect. Diamond hydraulic engine backwoods coli serious exceeding the allowed figure Diamond hydraulic engine user Mr. Chen, in, 2006 has June installed bench drill quarry water machine, after starts to live has drunk the lu water, felt the body is ill, the daily stomach flows swiftly many times, the proxy explanation is the change for the better response, Mr. Chen did not feel relieved, after therefore has handed over the lu water the chemical examination to analyze voluntarily, the result is backwoods coli serious exceeding the allowed figure.Mr. therefore Chen draws back immediately machine. The wired news kicks explodes the diamond energy water advertisement

Tags: Diamond water, water filtration system

Ganesh | Jun 23, 08 4:36pm

An average Malaysian, besides food and his silly car loan, spends the bulk of his money on education and health. However, in a country which is so rich in resources and wealth, I cannot see why the government is not building more hospitals and universities and actually providing free healthcare and free education.

In comparison, the UK has only double the population of Malaysia but it has hundreds of universities and hundreds of free hospitals.

After all, our government gets a lot of revenue from sources that other social state countries like the UK don’t like high taxes from cars etc. Some writer did some calculations and estimated that since the inception of high car taxes, the taxes collected from the purchase of new cars alone would be some RM170 billion to date.

Malaysia is rich in resources. In fact, many say, Malaysia is one of the richest countries in the world with natural resources, for example, oil, gas, oil palm, rubber, tin, gold. The UK does not have all these luxuries. For a country that is so rich, why are there so few hospitals and universities?

We are fortunate to have oil revenue. For the financial year ended March 31, 2007 (FY07), Petronas alone posted a net profit of RM46.4bil (and that is the old oil price). This year how much? RM100 billion maybe?

And mind you, that RM46.4 billion is net profit meaning that tens of billions have already been paid in tax to the government. This is just one company, what about the hundreds of companies listed on the Bursa which pays billions in taxes? Company tax is a very good source of revenue for the government.

Khazanah, the recent investment arm of the government, recently announced that its net worth now is RM53billion. Khazanah owns substantial stakes in companies. By holding large amounts of shares, I am sure it gets hundreds of millions in dividends.

The same with the EPF. The EPF invests the rakyat’s money, besides giving an interest on our balance and it makes substantial profit.

I do not want to elaborate on sales tax though it is a substantial form of revenue but I would like to touch on stamp duty. I remember paying about RM20,000 in stamp duty when I bought my house recently.

And I am just one person. What about the thousands who transact property everyday? Thousands of sale and purchase agreements for properties are done daily.

Stamp duty alone is this formula:

i) for the 1st RM100,000.000 – 1% i.e. 1/100 x RM100,000.00 = RM1,000

ii) for the next RM400,000.00 or part thereof – 2% i.e. 2/100 x RM400,000.00=RM8,000

iii) above RM500,000.00 – 3% i.e. 3/100 x any sum above RM500,000

So,the government makes loads of money from just stamp duty on property alone. Maybe its high time to channel a substantial sum to building more universities and hospitals?

And don’t forget personal income tax which also brings in billions. The list goes on, house assessment rates, quit rent, road tax etc.

Malaysia is blessed with little calamities. Unlike other countries where there are earthquakes and tornados which cause billions in damage, we don’t have to fork out a lot of money to repair damaged infrastructure or in aid for victims of natural calamities.

Just where is all the government revenue going?

Tags: Malaysian's tax

This is a very good article you should read..

Dun help others to put the “heung”into the “heung” holder, it have some local knowledge

When I go pray wit my husband, one lady stand in front of “help pregnant” God n touch her stomach, ask my husband to help her insert the “heung” into the “heung” holder.

But I feel very weird so ask my husband no need to help than the lady some more scold me that didnt saw her arm no convenience to insert the “heung”.

My husband thought that her arm hurt so help her, but when we finish pray then saw her actually very health on the road

So we direct call a brother that know un natural thing, he say someone teach this lady to borrow fetus this way, then teach us how to solve it

so, dun be too kind!! Only can help ppl u know well to insert the heung
wo!! So scary~

Never give ur sock to other

Today I heard a real incident that very scary

One secondary school gul when she go home… saw a Hong Kong citizen in front of her house, he say because he participate in wat wat wat program, then bet with someone, hopefully this gal can give him one sock.

Because the gal almost home, so she thinking about get a new one inside.

That guy say wan the one she wear, the gal saw he look so sincere, then give the sock she is wearing to him..

The guy very happy but also feel embarrassed, so give the gal 100 dollar, because she very rich, so she dun wan to take…

Dun think that this story end like this, that gal always feel tired n not well after that day

She also dun mind, but do u know that..

The guy who take her sock, dunno is foster “little ghost”or deal with the devil, wan to take this gal life..

Luckily this gal dad know a bit of “special ability”, know that this is someone doing something bad on her, so faster take her go “ki long” to find a Sifu…

That sifu direct ask the gal got take the money bo? She say didn’t, sifu say luckily didn’t, if not than can’t save her liao, like this the gal is secure…

That sifu say because now timing very bad, a lot of big ghost small ghost looking for ppl, everything need to be careful, especially is:

gal never give ppl this 7 things:
1. hair
2. nail
3. sock
4. other thing u wear

the rest I forget liao, those evil can take our life if have any of this

Everything need to be careful, dun simply take other money or thing, dun be greedy n kind as well. if u receive other ppl good article, dun be selfish to share, u can continue to share wit ur fren.

When we treat someone with real heart, someone with pay u back, hopefully we all r those ppl that “use heart” n “got heart”

Tags: Malaysia society

WHAT IS NEVER MENTIONED IN Mainstream Media like NST/TheStar/Utusan/BH are these facts….

Malaysian PerCapita Income USD 5000
VS
Singaporean PerCapita Income USD 25000

Further The Star made a comparison of prices in Thailand , Singapore and Indonesia .

For Thailand it is quoted at RM3.90/liter, however are they aware that in Thailand new cars are cheaper than Malaysia by RM10,000? They pay only one life time for their driving license? No renewal fee after that? Also that goes for road tax as well? And do TheStar also aware that you can drive all the way from Hadtyai to Bangkok on a six lane highway without paying any Tolls ??!!

Whereas here in Malaysia you have to pay yearly renewal for road tax , driving license and TOLLS, TOLLS, TOLLS!!!

For Singapore how can you quote RM 5.20 ? Please quote in Singapore Dollars because they are earning in Sing Dollars. You might as well say Europeans are paying RM10/liter. RM5.20/liter = Sing $ 2.20/liter, still cheaper than Malaysia in view of fact that Singapore is not a crude oil exporter. Are you saying that you fill up petrol in Singapore by paying Ringgit?

In economy, dollar to dollar must be compared as apple to apple. Not comparing like durian in M’sia is much cheaper than durian in Japan!! Of course-lah, Japan is not durian producer!!! Comparing Malaysian durian with Thailand durian make more sense!!

For Indonesia we might say is cheaper there at RM2.07/liter but compare that to their level of income!

Now, let us compare the price with OIL PRODUCING countries:

UAE – RM1.19/litre
Eygpt – RM1.03/litre
Bahrain – RM0.87/litre
Qatar – RM0.68/litre
Kuwait – RM0.67/litre
Saudi Arabia – RM0.38/litre
Iran – RM0.35/litre
Nigeria – RM0.32/litre
Turkmenistan – RM0.25/litre
Venezuela – RM0.16/litre
MALAYSIA – RM2.70/litre

RM 2.70!!! Individual perspective:

As of last month a Toyota Vios would ’cause a damage’ of about RM 89,000.
In the international market, a Toyota Vios is about USD 19,000
USD 19,000 = RM 62,700 (using the indicative rates of USD 1 = RM 3.30)
That makes Malaysian Vios owners pay an extra RM 26,300.

This RM 26,300 should be cost of operations, profit and tax because the transportation costs have been factored in to the USD 19,000.

RM 26,300/ RM625 petrol rebate per year translates to a Vios being used for 42.08 years.

I do understand that the RM 625 is a rebate given by the government, but it also means that one has to use the Vios for 42.08 years just to make back the amount paid in taxes for the usage of a foreign car. Would anyone use any kind of car for that long?

Now with these numbers in front of us, does the subsidy sound like a subsidy or does it sound like a penalty? This just seems to be a heavy increment in our daily cost of living as we are not only charged with high car taxes but also with a drastic increase in fuel price.

With all the numbers listed out, I urge all Malaysians to join me in analyzing the situation further.

Car taxation is government profit, fuel sales is Petronas’ (GLC) profit which also translates into government profit. The government may ridicule us Malaysians by saying look at the world market and fuel price world wide. Please, we are Malaysians, we fought of the British, had a international port in the early centuries (Malacca), home to a racially mixed nation and WE ARE NOT STUPID!!!

We know the international rates are above the USD 130/barrel. We understand the fact that the fuel prices are increasing worldwide and we also know that major scientist are still contradicting on why this phenomenon is happening. Some blame Bush and his plunders around the world and some blame climate change and there are others which say petroleum ‘wells’ are getting scarce.

Again we go back to numbers to be more straight fwd

1 barrel = 159 liters x RM2.70/liter = RM 429 or USD 134

On 1 hand, we are paying the full cost of 1 barrel of crude oil with RM2.70 per liter but on the other hand the crude oil only produces 46% of fuel.

Msia sells crude oil per barrel at USD130 buys back Fuel per barrel at USD134. And not forgetting, every barrel of fuel is produced with 2 barrels of crude oil.

1 barrel crude oil = produce 46% fuel (or half of crude oil), therefore
2 barrel crude oil = approximately 1 barrel fuel
In other words, each time we sell 2 barrels of crude oil, equivalently we will buy back 1 barrel of fuel.

Financially,
Malaysia sell 2 barrel crude oil @ USD 130/barrel = USD 260 = RM 858
then, Malaysia will buy back fuel @ USD 134/barrel = RM 442/barrel
Thus, Malaysia earn net extra USD 126 = RM 416 for each 2 barrel of crude sold/exported vs imported 1 barrel of fuel !!!
(USD 260-134 = USD 126 = RM416)

So where this extra USD 126/barrel income is channeled to by Malaysian Govt?????????

Another analysis:

1 barrel crude oil = 159 liters.
46-47% of a barrel of crude oil = fuel that we use in our vehicles.
46% of 159 = 73.14 liters.
@ RM 2.70/liter x 73.14 liter = RM197.48 of fuel per barrel of crude oil. This is only 46% of the barrel, mind you. Using RM 3.30 = USD 1, we get that a barrel of crude oil produces USD 59.84 worth of petrol fuel (46% of 1barrel).
USD 59.84 of USD 130/barrel turns out to be 46% of a barrel as well.

Another 54% = bitumen, kerosene, and natural gases and so many more.
And this makes a balance of USD 70.16 that has not been accounted for.

So this is where I got curious. Where is the subsidy if we are paying 46% of the price of a barrel of crude oil when the production of petrol/barrel of crude oil is still only 46%?

In actual fact, we still pay for this as they are charged in the forms of fuel surcharge by airlines and road taxes for the building of road (because they use the tar/bitumen) and many more excuse charging us but let us just leave all that out of our calculations.

As far as I know, only the politicians who live in Putrajaya and come for their Parliament meetings in Kuala Lumpur (approximately 60+ km) are the ones to gain as they claim their fuel and toll charges from the money of the RAKYAT’s TAX.

It is so disappointing to see this happen time and time again to the Malaysian public, where they are deceived by the propaganda held by the politicians and the controls they have over the press.

Which stupid idiot economist equates rebates for rich or poor with the cc of the vehicles? An average office clerk may own a second hand 1300cc proton Iswara costing $7,000 (rebate = $625) while the Datuk’s children can own a fleet of 10 new cars of BMW, Audi and Volvo all less than 2000cc costing $2 millions and get a total rebate of $625 x 10 = $6,250! Wow what kind of economists we are keeping in Malaysia…wonder which phD certificate that they bought from…

Misleading concept of Subsidy:

The word “subsidy” has been brandished by the BN government as if it has so generously helped the rakyat and in doing so incurred losses. This simple example will help to explain the fallacy:

Example:
Ahmad is a fisherman. He sells a fish to you at $10 which is below the market value of $15. Let’s assume that he caught the fish from the abundance of the sea at little or no cost. Ahmad claims that since the market value of the fish is $15 and he sold you the fish for $10, he had subsidised you $5 and therefore made a loss of $5.

Question : Did Ahmad actually make a profit of $10 or loss of $5 which he claimed is the subsidy?

Answer:
Ahmad makes a profit of $10 which is the difference of the selling price ($10) minus the cost price ($0 since the fish was caught from the abundance of the sea). There is no subsidy as claimed by Ahmad.

The BN government claims that it is a subsidy because the oil is kept and treated as somebody else’s property (you know who). By right, the oil belongs to all citizens of the country and the government is a trustee for the citizens. So as in the above simple example, the BN government cannot claim that it has subsidised the citizen!

Tags: Fuel charges in Malaysia, The Malaysian Oil Dilemma